Scientist Scans His Brain Twice A Week For 18 Months And This Is What He Found

For 18 months, Stanford psychologist Russell Poldrack scanned his brain activity twice a week to understand how functional areas of his brain communicate.

Every Tuesday and Thursday morning, for 18 months, Poldrack scanned his brain, and monitored how his neurological activity changed over time using a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner, a device that can track the flow of blood in the body.  The main aim of this study was to determine how different parts of the brain speak to each other and modify themselves, from the visual centres to those that control movement. It’s well known that the brain possesses the remarkable ability to reorganize itself. This trait, known as “plasticity,” means that if one section of the brain is damaged or altered in some way, it can call on other sections of the brain to pick up the slack.

These various brain sections “correspond” with each other using a network called the connectome. Researchers have previously mapped this network using MRI scanners, essentially making them neural cartographers. An engineer might refer to this map as the brain’s “wiring diagram.”

The MRI in this case looked at the connectome of Poldrack’s brain. The data set is so huge that there is an ongoing effort to establish what exactly happened during the experiment, but the initial results have been released. Although his overall connectivity did not change much over the 18 months, changes in his behavior caused rapid changes in his neurological activity.

In the most notable example, he fasted and cut out his regular morning coffee before his Tuesday scan. The scans showed that the connections between the systems in the brain responsible for vision and those associated with the sense of touch, pressure, pain, temperature, position, movement, and vibration – the somatosensory system – became far tighter when he reduced his caffeine and food intake.

“We don’t really know if [this is] better or worse, but it’s interesting that these are relatively low-level areas,” Poldrack said in a statement. “It may well be that I’m more fatigued on those days, and that drives the brain into this state that’s focused on integrating those basic processes more.”

Of course, there is still much more to look at in this enormous data set. “The one big thing we are looking at now is now connectivity changes in the very short term, over the course of seconds,” Poldrack told IFLScience. “Our previous analyses all assumed that connectivity was constant across each 10 minute scan, but we know that’s not the case, so now we are trying to unpack more precisely the way that it varies over time.”

It is worth noting that although this is an unprecedentedly detailed study, it was only conducted on one subject. Regardless, by analyzing his own brain for this length of time, Poldrack has one of the most studied brains in the world.

Source IFL Science.com

 

The opposite of addiction is not sobriety. The opposite of addiction is connection.


Today  I want to expand on a previous post entitled Does addiction exist?  Despite decades of research on the effects of addictive drugs on the brain, neuroscience cannot yet predict who will become addicted, or how to cure it.

This begs the sobering question – Is everything we think we know about addiction wrong?

This short video really nails the lie that addictive drugs alone (e.g. alcohol, cocaine, heroin and nicotine) are the sole culprit in creating addiction and it does so by giving powerful examples of how our environment and in particular the people around us, and how we engage with them that is actually the deciding factor as to whether-or-not we become addicted.

Probably the most important message to be taken from this video is the realization that for an addiction therapy to be effective it must rely less on medication and more on compassion and inclusion, a fact known to all good addiction therapists for a long time. I look forward to developing this theme in greater detail in future posts including drug-free tips on how to beat addiction.

 

 

Inside The Sleeping Brain


Why do we sleep? We spend a third of our lives in slumber, but science has yet to determine exactly why we have do it. Here’s a look at how sleep works, why we’re not getting enough sleep, what happens if you DON’T sleep, and an idea about where sleep came from in the first place

Is Seeing Believing?

Sometimes, against a uniform, bright background such as a clear sky or a blank computer screen, you might see things floating across your field of vision. What are these moving objects, and how are you seeing them? Michael Mauser explains the visual phenomenon that is floaters.

Why are some people left-handed?

Today, about one-tenth of the world’s population are southpaws. Why are such a small proportion of people left-handed — and why does the trait exist in the first place? Daniel M. Abrams investigates how the uneven ratio of lefties and righties gives insight into a balance between competitive and cooperative pressures on human evolution.